Why is it that when you bash a national band you don’t like, everyone is all cool with it? They think it’s alright to bash national bands. When you bash the unsigned and local bands, it makes you the bad guy. I’ve always wondered this. Why is this you wonder? I’ve been trying to figure this out and I think I just did. The reason it’s okay for people to bash national bands is that they are big & famous, rich. A lot of them don’t really read the internet, so they won’t really care what people would have to say about them online.

When you bash the unsigned & local bands they can, read the internet. They are able to read & reply to things since they aren’t famous and not in the big time. When you bash the unsigned bands that have a large following, their fans and supporters would usually stick up for them, no matter what is said about them. A lot of times, bands would usually reply to all the critics bashing them and they would try to defend themselves.

There are still unsigned bands & artists that I don’t like. There are some out there that I think are crap musicians and they can be unprofessional. I would like to continue to bash unsigned bands to this day and give my honest opinion on them publicly, but I would keep my opinions to myself from now on. I’m done being the bad guy in music. I have been done for a long while. It’s still okay to be brutally honest about unsigned music, just leave names out of the public and you won’t get a backlash, things would be fine.

It is weird how this is, but people are just being people. It is hard to be a critic in unsigned music ’cause everyone would get upset over the things you say, when this is only the internet. I don’t feel regret of how I posted on the internet in the past. If you think I feel bad for it, then you’re wrong. It was a learning experience for sure, and that’s how I look at it.

Kev