The USA Pageant officials announced today that they aren’t responsible to decide whether the pageants gets to keep their crowns or not. Like I already said the other day, it is all up to the Donald himself, since he owns the Pageant.
TMZ reports:
http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/11/miss-cali-officials-its-all-up-to-trump/
I still think the Donald will still support her. He will let her have her California crown and maybe even let her be in this year’s runners up that she was disqualified for.
If Donald does this, Perez Hilton will be bitching about him for weeks and weeks. I’m sure of it! Be careful Perez, if you’re reading this. You know how the Donald treated Rosie O’ Donnell, I see a heated Donald Trump vs. Perez Hilton media feud pretty quick. It all depends if Donald supports Carrie which I think he will. He already gave a hint of that the other day.
Oh yeah, I’ll admit that Carrie is pretty fuckin’ hot looking too, seriously.
Kev
K'Brocking 
This is NOT an issue of civil rights, its a moral and ethical issue based on Liberty; and it is that gay judge that is interfering with the right of moral Christian people to pursue HAPPINESS. Moral Christian people just want to get away from something that is revolting, disgusting, and immoral. Moral Christians oppose that gay judge attacking one of their beautiful women, and their moral values, and that gay judge is also making us unhappy with exposure to his disgusting immorality. Now, Just in case Donald Trump decides against Carrie Prejean, this should be the response of supporter’s for Carrie Prejean: Carrie’s RIGHT to support the (NOM) and marriage between a man and a woman is based on the Declaration Of Independence (that the USA is founded upon), which states that “We The People” have the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the [ PURSUIT of HAPPINESS ]. In litigation thereafter, the U. S. Supreme Court declared in, ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1 ); that, the freedom to marry is recognized as a vital [ PERSONAL RIGHT ] that is essential to the pursuit of happiness. As a result of this precedent, that gay judge has violated the liberty rights of Carrie Prejean, with a defamation of character, because she would not corrupt her Christian beliefs to obtain his vote. So, he condemned her pursuit of happiness, to marry a MAN, defamed her character, and destroyed her career objectives. The (NOM) can file suit against that gay judge; because, Carrie’s personal rights prevail over his need to corrupt her, and that gay judge is only motivated by personal bias and animosity against moral Christian values (Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) 262 US 390). You see, Carrie didn’t attack him, he attacked and slandered Carrie because she refused to corrupt herself to get his vote, and this the way it always is, gays are using their authority to deprive moral Christians of our personal liberty rights to pursue traditional Christian values. Another thing, why would a “Modern Woman” who is Liberated and Free, allow a sodomite to deprive her of the right to pursue happiness, as EQUALLY, as a gay sodomite does, in his sodomite life style?