Interesting facts about Obama’s obsession with drones…

541493_10152135947608459_1959115274_n

I stole this image from the Alex Jones Info Wars page and if you research this info yourself you would see that this info is not making anything up. Don’t get me started that the reason for Obama’s obsession for drones is to help fight terrorism when you know there’s no reason to drop drones on people. Obama dropped drones on people ’cause he is evil. Pure and simple. Hitler would have been proud.

Don’t get me started on George W. Bush either. Yeah, George W. used drone attacks too but not as much as Obama. Obama used drones too much and I’m sure he’s still doing it. If you don’t think this is murder, I don’t know what else it is.

Kev

 

38 thoughts on “Interesting facts about Obama’s obsession with drones…”

    1. I know for a fact Obama would never put his fellow Muslim people to harm as he would be very protective of them. Obama’s killing innocent women and children all over, and other civilians.

      Kev

      1. Obummer has been dropping drones in other areas and countries other than Pakistan and Afghanistan. He’s been dropping them everywhere.

        Kev

      2. Not only Obummer has killed innocent civilians in other countries, he’s even killed our fellow Americans and even destroyed American planes with drones.

        It’s interesting how people think Obummer has every right to use drone strikes. What about innocent lives? Guess people don’t care for that one single bit.

        Kev

      3. The numbers in the poster you posted are from Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. They are all muslim nations, and each are part of the “57 states”.

      4. One thing to keep in mind that Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan… those countries maybe Muslim populated but that doesn’t mean everyone in all three of those countries are Muslim.

        Kev

      5. I know those three countries are pretty heavy on Islam but it’s possible that non-Muslims can live in those countries too, I believe. Remember, some of those drone victims were American.

        Kev

      6. That’s not seriously your argument is it? Do you know what Pakistan’s official name is?

        The Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan was created SPECIFICALLY as a Muslim State. It is their official State religion, and it is their Constitution. If ever there was definition of Muslim/Islam state, Pakistan is it.

      7. I know those three countries are pretty heavy on Islam but it’s possible that non-Muslims can live in those countries too, I believe. Remember, some of those drone victims were American.

        Kev

      8. Actually, Yemen and Somalia are less-Muslim populated. Pakistan maybe over-populated with Muslims but they’re not THAT over-populated like many mistakenly thought it would. The country that is most Muslim populated has always been Indonesia which is where Barack grew up.

        These are the ten most-populated Muslim countries and I don’t see Yemen and Somalia listed at all.

        http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-countries-with-largest-muslim-populations-map.html

        Kev

      9. In regards to total population, maybe. Look up the term “per capita”.

        And that does not change the fact than Obama is hitting official “Muslim States” with drones and killing muslims.

        84% of Indonesia is muslim. 98% of Pakistan is Muslim. How many terrorists come from Indonesia?

      10. Are you serious? 98% of Pakistan is muslim. 98%! Again. look up the term per capita. You will see why that is a far more accurate representation of the facts. 2 million people in Pakistan vs 2 BILLION in India. of course general population is going to be higher.

        And the “Muslim States” the “57 Muslim states” that you think Obama wants to be a part of? Somalia and Yemen are a part of those “57 States”.

        Your argument is shot to hell. Top ten is a fairly empty statement. Somalia and Yemen are still in the top 20-25% in the world. In fact, ALL 57 of the “57 Muslim states are in the top 29% of the world.

      11. 99% of Yemen is Muslim.
        98.6% of Somalia is Muslim.
        96.4% of Pakistan is Muslim.

        The actual percentage of the Muslim population in the “Top 10” you posted.

        Indonesia: 85.1
        India: 14.6
        Pakistan: 96.4
        Bangladesh: 90.4
        Nigeria: 98.3
        Egypt: 94.7
        Iran: 99.6
        Turkey: 98.6
        Algeria: 98.2
        Morocco: 99.9

      12. 11% of the world’s Muslims live in Pakistan. They are number 2 in the world as a percentage of their population being Muslim. Number 1 is Indonesia, by percentage of the countries population. at 12%.

        Do you understand these numbers? Percentages and what they mean? These are the true representations.

        Indonesia: #1 on your chart: 209,120,000 people living in Indonesia are Muslim. 37,780,000 people living in Indonesia are NOT muslim

        By comparison, in Pakistan, 167,410,000 are muslim. 11,790,000 are not.

        India has 175,800,000 muslims. 1,069,810,000 are not muslim.

    1. Like I said, I love how people think Obama is using drones to fight off terrorism when you know that isn’t his goal with the drones at all. He says that’s the reason he’s doing it, making claims to keep America safe and kill the badguys but he needs to go after the badguys. I don’t see him doing that. Instead he’s killing 100’s of innocent people who had nothing to do with 9/11 and other terrorist attacks. What part of that can’t you understand? Wake up, idiot.

      Kev

  1. With the technology available these days, it seems they could pull of more precise strikes to reduce the number of innocent casualties.

    But there is one thing you have to consider, and I would sincerely love to hear your thoughts on this:

    The terrorists surround themselves with women and children. Using them as shields. You don’t find that cowardly? You claim we “defend Obama” when we don’t agree with you. But applying your very own logic to your posts, it would appear that you are defending terrorism.

    You claim Obama is the Hitler of our generation, yet what he does pales in comparison to what these terrorists are doing. They are indoctrinating their very own into their campaigns and having children, YES children, strap on suicide vests, not only killing themselves but killing other innocent women and children as well.

    Why is nobody pointing this out? Why is there no outrage over this? It never seems to get talked about.

    I am not trying to attack you here. I would very much appreciate to hear your thoughts on this, and see some honest and serious discussion from you on this.

    If you can do this, and remain civil about, so can I . And I am sure the others will as well. For as wrong as Obama might be, what the terrorists are doing is far worse. Do you care to discuss or respond to this, or are you just going to delete it?

    1. “The terrorists surround themselves with women and children. Using them as shields. You don’t find that cowardly? You claim we “defend Obama” when we don’t agree with you. But applying your very own logic to your posts, it would appear that you are defending terrorism.”

      About terrorists surrounding themselves with women and children to protect themselves, that’s not exactly true and you know it. That doesn’t happen very often with terrorists. It only happened with the Gaza war and Hamas admitted to using women and children as shields. From them on, that’s what led people to believe that all terrorists do the same thing when that’s not true. People only say that stuff to defend the government’s right of using drones.

      I’m also not the one defending terrorism. The more you guys think that Obama is innocent in killing people when he’s not, the more you guys are the ones who are defending terrorism ’cause that’s what Obummer is. A terrorist.

      You claim Obama is the Hitler of our generation, yet what he does pales in comparison to what these terrorists are doing. They are indoctrinating their very own into their campaigns and having children, YES children, strap on suicide vests, not only killing themselves but killing other innocent women and children as well.

      That’s partly true that terrorists are using children as suicide bombers but that mostly happens in Afghanistan and the Palestinian/Israel conflict.

      What you don’t understand is that Obama has been killing children who have nothing to do with terrorism. They never lived with terrorist families, just innocent people and civilians.

      Not all of Obama’s drone victims were terrorists.

      I wish people would quit defending the government’s right of using drones. I understand that going after the bad guys is a big deal but there are other solutions of going after them and I think drones aren’t the way to go. I think drone strikes are unconstitutional for the most part.

      The drones is just part of the NDAA at work. The NDAA is pretty unconstitutional too.

      Kev

  2. Lethal strikeshttp://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/01/23/more-than-2400-dead-as-obamas-drone-campaign-marks-five-years/

    Across Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the Obama administration has launched more than 390 drone strikes in the five years since the first attack that injured Qureshi – eight times as many as were launched in the entire Bush presidency. These strikes have killed more than 2,400 people, at least 273 of them reportedly civilians.

    Although drone strikes under Obama’s presidency have killed nearly six times as many people as were killed under Bush, the casualty rate – the number of people killed on average in each strike – has dropped from eight to six under Obama. The civilian casualty rate has fallen too. Strikes during the Bush years killed nearly more than three civilians in each strike on average. This has halved under Obama (1.43 civilians per strike on average). In fact reported civilian casualties in Pakistan have fallen sharply since 2010, with no confirmed reports of civilian casualties in 2013.

    The decline in civilian casualties could be because of reported improvements in drone and missile technology, rising tensions between Pakistan and the US over the drone campaign, and greater scrutiny of the covert drone campaign both at home and abroad.

  3. “What you don’t understand is that Obama has been killing children who have nothing to do with terrorism. They never lived with terrorist families, just innocent people and civilians.”

    I am not arguing with you here. I am AGREEING with you. You are only presenting ONE SIDE of the story though. Terrorists are killing FAR MORE innocent men, women and children than Obama has. You are condoning their actions by default in failing to report both sides of the story purely to paint the picture of Obama that YOU want everyone else to see.

    Obama is bad. We get it. Every one does. But the terrorists are FAR WORSE, and YOU do not seem to get THAT.

    1. Actually, Obama is WORSE than the terrorists. It’s the other way around. Obama aided terrorists in Syria guns and even helped Al-Qaeda. Now Al-Qaeda seems to be involved with the Benghazi attacks which means that Obama must of worked with them to attack the consulate.

      It’s great that you think he’s bad… you guys still fail to see that this man is a fucking monster and extremely dangerous. Someday you’re gonna see it. Actually, most of us know… you guys are slow at learning this.

      Kev

  4. Helloooooo, is there anybody in there….

    we DO see it. But we also see what the terrorists are doing.

    Obama killed 2400 over 5 years. Terrorists killed over 3000 in 20 minutes. And that was just one attack.

    You want to kmow waht kind of propagandistic bullshit sites like infowars engage in? That Alec Jones poster above? Those numbers are inflated. They iclude the deaths from under the Bush admministration as well, and they are STILL high. Here are the numbers from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (the source dited in that poster)

    Total strikes: 370
    Total reported killed: 2,548 – 3,549
    Civilians reported killed: 411 – 890
    Children reported killed: 168 – 197
    Total reported injured: 1,177 – 1,480
    Strikes under the Bush Administration: 52
    Strikes under the Obama Administration: 318

    It is stated in a Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) report that of all the drone attack victims since 2004, more than 76% of the dead fall in the legal grey zone, 22% are confirmed civilians (included 5% minors) and only the remaining 1.5% are high-profile targets

    1. 52 strikes under Bush administration isn’t that much at all. For them it would be small. Still, though, that doesn’t give Bush the right to use drone strikes either.

      Kev

      1. Did you miss this part?

        “Although drone strikes under Obama’s presidency have killed nearly six times as many people as were killed under Bush, the casualty rate – the number of people killed on average in each strike – has dropped from eight to six under Obama. The civilian casualty rate has fallen too. Strikes during the Bush years killed nearly more than three civilians in each strike on average. This has halved under Obama (1.43 civilians per strike on average). In fact reported civilian casualties in Pakistan have fallen sharply since 2010, with no confirmed reports of civilian casualties in 2013.”

  5. No civilian deaths in 2013. So you all have to go back further and keeping bringing up old shit to argue when things are clearly improving. Isn’t that what you want?

    The situation is getting better, but you refuse to acknowledge that. You just go back to past and harp on it. WTF?

      1. I delete ’em ’cause all you do is insult me most of the time. If I lose respect ’cause I’m strict on moderating this site, I don’t care. I’m not here to please everyone and could give a rats ass how everyone else feels.

        Kev

  6. by the way guys, Obama’s plan to Islamicize America is nothing new. That’s what Dinesh D’Souza’s movie, “Obama’s America 2016” is about. Try watching the movie. It’s good!!! On top of that, Obama already told Pastor Don Jones that he had plans to turn the US into a Muslim state by 2016. Look it up.

    I don’t make this shit up and you try to make it look like that I do.

    Kev

    1. Here’s what will happen – in 2016, nothing will have changed. Then you and everyone else will have to go back to believing in chemtrails and looking for Mothman.

      1. I actually agree with that. I don’t think anything will happen either ’cause it would be a difficult thing to do but ya never know, though. Barack seems pretty serious about this. There could be a serious Muslim takeover and we could all be dead. It would be very difficult to change a country but it has been done before in the past, though. In order for Barack to be successful of this, I would think there would need to be a war over it ’cause the US will definitely want to defend our country.

        I wish you guys would quit acting like Barack is innocent in everything ’cause you know he isn’t. He’s not even innocent in killing people and not innocent with the drones either.

        Kev

Leave a comment