Dinesh D’ Souza is right on the money like usual. This is why liberal media is not aggressive on Obama. This is why some refuses to believe that Benghazi was a cover-up by the White House and why some refuses to believe that Holder/Obama was behind “Operation: F&F” ’cause liberal media refuses to report those stories. You don’t see liberal TV networks (like NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC) and you don’t see liberal newspapers (like the Washington Post, NYTimes, etc.) being aggressive on Obama about all of his crimes and scandals.

All those news giants just doesn’t want to make our first black president look bad. If they reported stories that Obama was responsible for Benghazi and Operation: F&F… it would put their businesses in hot water. They could lose ratings for their networks and people would stop buying their papers.

This is why liberals in America can’t see that Obama is a criminal that he is, simply because they don’t wanna see our first black president as a failure.

America thought electing a first black president would be a good thing for the country. They all voted Obama ’cause they all thought it would make history electing our first black president. You know, just because they’re black doesn’t always mean they are good people. When will people understand that??? Electing a black president isn’t always good for the country. You have to look at his behavior, personality and all that stuff.

When America elects our first woman president, they’ll do the same for her as long as she’s a democrat. If she does all kinds of bad things and commits all kinds of crime, liberal media will protect her too. Just wait until Hillary’s president.

I hate our national news media. I don’t really pay attention to any of it. If they did more honest reporting and did their jobs, Obama would have been gone a long time ago. Not only our US Government is corrupt and broken… the news media is corrupt and broken too.

Kev