This is already getting interesting. Which side do you take more seriously? I’m siding with Gawker all the way after reading what’s going on so far.

Hogan’s lawyers claims they have the proof that Gawker did this to harm Hogan on purpose by showing them traffic stats and messages of the staff talking about it. Really? That’s the best proof they could come up with?

On Gawker’s side, they said Hulk was willing to talk about his sex life publicly in different kinds of publications and on the Howard Stern show which is totally true if you think about it. Hulk Hogan is all over the place crying that he has his rights for “privacy” yet he has made everything about his sex life publicly in books and interviews? How ironic and weird is that?

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/07/media/hulk-hogan-court-sex-tape/index.html

I think Gawker had their right to post the video ’cause the 1st Amendment protects that. They didn’t remove the video yet ’cause they don’t have to. It’s their right. It’s what they do. They’re a gossip site. They report on people and famous celebrities. They’re no different than any other gossip site on the internet like TMZ, perezhilton, Radar, etc. They do leaks like that all the time on famous people.

Hogan claims he feels destroyed by this and his privacy is invaded? HAHAHA… BULLSHIT! I’m almost pretty sure Hogan could care less that the video got out there. He’s only suing Gawker out of this ’cause it’s a money making opportunity for him since his wrestling career has gone down the toilet. Hogan must be dead broke and is only looking for a big payday. Hogan wearing all black is all there is you need to know about the man. He’s wearing all black in this trial just so he can look mean and tough.

I hope the judge does the right thing and throws the lawsuit out, giving Gawker the victory. Hogan’s a piece of shit.

Kev