Some questions that needs to get answered over this whole thing:

1. How did Gawker get hold of the sex tape? Who’s the publisher?

2. Did Hogan really know he was being filmed?

3. How are they going to prove that Gawker intentionally tried to destroy him and his image?

Hulk claimed he didn’t know he was being filmed but that could be a flat-out lie as well. We need proof on whether or not Hogan knew he was being filmed. We also need hard evidence on how Gawker got hold of the sex tape but so far there are none yet. Who sent the tape to them?

This is how Hulk is gonna lose the Gawker trial ’cause they’re gonna need answers to those three questions which they are never gonna get. Like I said, Gawker’s gonna win the dismissal and freedom of speech will win. On top of that, it’s gonna be very difficult to prove how Gawker intentionally tried to “harm” Hulk Hogan and they’re never gonna prove it.

Here’s day 4:

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/10/media/hulk-hogan-gawker-journalism-professor/index.html

Anyway, Gawker’s defense of posting the video on their site is they think it’s “fascinating” and “newsworthy”. I agree. Well, one thing that Hulk has to learn that celebrity “sex-tapes” has always been a hot topic in Hollywood land. A lot of celebrities has become victims of sex tapes leaks most notably Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton which both of those ladies became famous for. That’s what they do report the news on “celebrities”.

I really do believe Hulk is gonna lose this thing, big time. It’s looking like it so far. Hulk’s got nothing to prove. Where’s the hard evidence? Talking doesn’t prove anything. They need EVIDENCE!

Btw, the reason Hulk is wearing a do-rag in court is ’cause he’s bald.

Kev