Why did the jury side with both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan? Is it because the juries are afraid they’re gonna get sued by them if they don’t? Did they side with them to protect themselves and to protect the judge? Just some things to think about, y’all. So because the juries sided with Erin and Hulk doesn’t necessarily make them the winners. Keep in mind that famous people can get away with anything. What’s going on here? Is every victim of “invasion of privacy” gonna win every lawsuit? Seems like it. I think there’s another “liberal” thing going on here and it’s all politics for sure. Some of you may ask what does liberal politics have to do with this “invasion of privacy”? Well “invasion of privacy” have something to do with human rights kind of thing for sure. It’s a human rights issue is what it is. So they always have to side with left wing views. So I definitely believe there was a lot of left-wing politics involved.

Like I said many times before when you have a lot of money and fame, you can get away with anything and everything. The jury always have to side with the celebrity on everything. Possibly to avoid getting sued and avoid getting humiliated by the mainstream media. Seems like celebrities and famous people are above everything these days. They think they can get away with everything ’cause of their fame.

I’ll have more on this topic tomorrow.

Kev