There’s a lot of “I won’t believe it until I see proof” kind of people out there. If that’s the whole point of why some fail to see that Obama is a criminal, a fraud or a murderer, then so be it. It’s really easy to see what kind of man Obama is. It can’t be that hard to spot at all. I don’t know why it takes so long for some to learn. It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Like I explained in a post before his least transparency is giving him the power for you to think that way. He wants you to believe that he’s an innocent man. All of his crimes and scandals are so mysterious and a lot of them are left unanswered ’cause that’s the way he wants it. It was all intentional. He doesn’t want you to be believe that he was responsible for his crimes and scandals. So he tries to think of different ways to fool you like blame Bush, blame FOX news and blame those evil conservatives. He never comes clean with his crimes and scandals ’cause he doesn’t want to. He does it to get us all talking. He is just giving us the right to discuss whether or not he’s innocent or guilty.
When it comes to people committing crimes, we don’t need to be the “I won’t believe it until I see proof” type. In this day and age it certainly doesn’t seem like that anymore. From what I remember… people immediately put the blame on OJ for the murder of Nicole and Ron way early even before that controversial trial. People immediately predicted Michael Jackson of molesting kids early. People immediately predicted that Amanda Knox was guilty. People immediately predicted that Casey Anthony was guilty of murdering her own daughter early.
People do the same thing when people commit dangerous crimes in your hometown locally.
Nothing wrong with predicting early with famous political figures also. We all have the right to have an opinion on who is innocent or guilty.
If I remember correctly everybody put the blame on 9/11/01 on George W. Bush. They also gave him a bunch of shit on Weapons of Mass Destruction and his troubles with Iraq and stuff. They also blamed him on the 13 embassy attacks under his watch. All that with no evidence or proof. Yet people still think he’s guilty of all that.
However… not many people want to think Obama is guilty of anything. If you blame him, people will think it’s wrong and will give you a bunch of shit for it. I’ve had it with the way the American people react toward Obama like this. American media and politics on the internet is all messed up for sure.
There’s nothing wrong with blaming Obama for things. It’s totally okay to discuss the conclusion and have an opinion on it. No matter how much shit people give me, I will always have an honest opinion on whether or not he is responsible for his actions.
There is this, “Innocent until proven guilty” yes but in this day and age those days are over.
Kev
K'Brocking 
Um, there were no weapons of mass destruction.
There are now. Isis just found ’em recently. They knew there WMD’s after all this time.
Kev
I just read that Isis took over the Saddam Hussein’s WMD facility. The news media claims Isis can’t make chemical weapons but ya never know. They are probably trying to figure it out.
Kev
Really? I hadn’t read or heard that. Link?
This news has been out for a couple of days now.
http://www.ibtimes.com/isis-seizes-saddam-era-chemical-weapons-facility-us-says-site-has-no-materials-military-1606158
If they found Saddam Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction facility then there probably were WMD and Bush was right all along.
Kev
There is this, “Innocent until proven guilty” yes but in this day and age those days are over.
Kev
No. Those days are not over. You can think someone is guilty all you want. You can believe all you want.
But no court can convict anyone without proof. “Innocent until proven guilty” has nothing to do what people believe or think. It is a legal principle. In the eyes of the law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
As far as Obama goes, I think he’s a liar and treasonous and guilty covering something up as far as Benghazi goes.
I just don’t believe that ordered an attack on an American Embassy. There is absolutely nothing out there to indicate or even imply he gave an order like that.
I’m still waiting for to show me a link to something…ANYTHING that supports that claim.
No. Those days are not over. You can think someone is guilty all you want. You can believe all you want.
But no court can convict anyone without proof. “Innocent until proven guilty” has nothing to do what people believe or think. It is a legal principle. In the eyes of the law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
I respect your opinion but I’m sticking with mine.
As far as Obama goes, I think he’s a liar and treasonous and guilty covering something up as far as Benghazi goes.
I just don’t believe that ordered an attack on an American Embassy. There is absolutely nothing out there to indicate or even imply he gave an order like that.
You clearly don’t understand the Benghazi cover-up at all, do you? There’s nothing out there to indicate that he gave the order of the Benghazi attack ’cause they don’t want that info to get out there to the public. That’s why there’s so much lying and stonewalling out of this administration. They don’t want people to know that they were behind it. It’s easy to tell how this administration was behind this attack. All you have to do is follow the story.
The truth of Obama ordering the Benghazi attack isn’t out there just yet but it will get out there soon.
Kev
Isn’t our whole judicial system founded on ‘innocent until proven guilty?’
It used to be but not anymore. In this day and age, it’s the other way around.
Kev