I could have sworn that reader bone75 said he wouldn’t believe any political stories that is targeted at Barack Obama unless they show up on “credible” sources like the Washington Post, NPR, etc. Welp, the story on Ben Rhodes getting together a bunch of people to prepare for the Susan Rice TV appearances just landed on the Washington Post. So this story seems 100% credible…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/04/29/benghazi-scandal-tied-to-white-house/
I hate to be the one to say this guys but us crazy “conspiracy theorists” have been trying to tell you for months that the Obama administration was totally behind this. They were totally up to something and this was definitely a cover-up. I’d hate to be the one to tell you, “I told you so” but yeah, “I told you so”.
Maybe you guys: bone, Pauper and everyone else will finally admit that the White House were totally behind the Benghazi attacks after this story coming out yesterday.
Like I said the truth will come out.
This story should be good enough to get a full investigation going.
Kev
K'Brocking 
It’s an Op-Ed piece.
Sure enough, you’ll deny everything that’s posted about the Obama administration even if it’s on your favorite credible sources like the Washington Post. You’re too predictable, dude.
Kev
Get over it, dude. Your boy Obama is a murderer and he’s gonna get impeached and prosecuted. Benghazi will be good enough to take him down.
Kev
Yes, that article is an opinion piece. She’s writing from a right-wing perspective but Washington Post writers wouldn’t write about stuff if things weren’t “verifiable”. This story is 100% verifiable. You’ll never admit it no matter what is being said.
Kev
I never said that – I believe the story, obviously it’s true, but do I think it “proves” anything other than they all discussed talking points, which is something EVERY administration does when they’re making public statements? No.
Doesn’t matter what you think. All this proves that the White House have been covering up on Benghazi. Period.
Soon it will be proven that Barack and Hillary were totally responsible. Both of them murderers.
Kev
Ok.
That article does not state, prove or even imply that the White House was behind the attacks. It only shows that the White House was trying to cover up the real reason or cause of the attacks.
It’s clear that it was a terrorist attack, and quite possibly al Qaeda behind it. If it was proven that al Qaeda was behind it, that would have hurt Obama in the reelection, considering their stance that “al Qaeda is dead”
And so far, it doesn’t show a clear connection yo Obama at all..
My belief in what they are truing to cover up is two things:
1. that Al Qaeda was behind it, and
2. that they ignored the warnings that attacks were imminent.
That article does not state, prove or even imply that the White House was behind the attacks. It only shows that the White House was trying to cover up the real reason or cause of the attacks.
I know it doesn’t. I’m not dumb. If they’re covering up for something and trying to make the President “look good” then that should be a good enough sign that he was totally responsible. Whether he was responsible or not and trying to cover up something… it’s still pretty treasonous and an impeachable offense, no matter what you think of it.
It’s clear that it was a terrorist attack, and quite possibly al Qaeda behind it. If it was proven that al Qaeda was behind it, that would have hurt Obama in the reelection, considering their stance that “al Qaeda is dead”
There’s no real proof of a terrorist attack. It’s just Obama himself making claims that it was. How would Al-Qaeda being behind Benghazi hurt Obama’s re-election? Doesn’t make a bit of sense. The only way Benghazi would hurt his re-election if he was caught committing the crime himself. That’s why the Benghazi attacks was covered-up. Obama attacked the Embassy to help him win the re-election. It was all a political move. Period.
And so far, it doesn’t show a clear connection yo Obama at all..
Ben Rhodes was one of Obama’s closest assistants who was sent out by Obama to help the Susan Rice video thing. Of course, this connects to Obama in every way.
My belief in what they are truing to cover up is two things:
1. that Al Qaeda was behind it, and
2. that they ignored the warnings that attacks were imminent.
It’s true that Al-Qaeda may have been involved but my belief is that I think Obama have been working closely with them by sending Al-Qaeda $500 million worth of guns. Obama is obsessed with arming our enemies and this was how Benghazi all started.
You really need to stop believing in Obama’s lies and the media.
I had a feeling that you were gonna come on here and act like Obama is innocent. You’re too predictable too.
Kev
How would attacking an embassy clear across the globe help Obama’s re-election?
How would attacking an embassy clear across the globe help Obama’s re-election?
Well the goal of Benghazi was that Obama wanted to kidnap Ambassador Stevens to trade in for the Blind Sheik. He was gonna trade in with the Blind Sheik so the Blind Sheik can be put in a US prison and I think the Obama administration wanted to let the public know that they caught the Blind Sheik so Obama can win over more votes but of course, Obama’s goal in trading for the Blind Sheik failed. Look it up. I posted articles on this more than enough times.
Kev
The NYT had the most extensive, in-depth reporting on it to date, and it’s pretty obvious this DID all start from that ridiculous movie. Everyone seems to be forgetting that there were a dozen Islamic nations with people up in arms that day.
That NYTimes article was bullshit. It was pretty liberal and all it was doing was just protecting Hillary.
Kev
The NYT had the most extensive, in-depth reporting on it to date, and it’s pretty obvious this DID all start from that ridiculous movie. Everyone seems to be forgetting that there were a dozen Islamic nations with people up in arms that day.
The Ben Rhodes e-mail proved that getting government people together to prepare for Susan Rice to blame it on the video was proof that the NYTimes article was lying. The Benghazi attack didn’t happen over some stupid video at all. Gregory Hicks made it clear at the hearings there was no evidence of a video protest. They gave Susan Rice the idea to blame it on the video to help cover Obama’s ass. That NYTimes article “not” credible.
Kev
http://patriotpost.us/articles/25314
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/25317
I don’t believe obama is innocent at all. I do believe they are guilty of a cover up. But directly ordering or assisting in the attack- that’s fool’s theory.
What’s predictable is you proclaiming every little detail as “proof” Obama ordered the attacks.
I don’t believe obama is innocent at all. I do believe they are guilty of a cover up. But directly ordering or assisting in the attack- that’s fool’s theory.
I find it pretty insane how this story here, Obama going to bed during the attack and taking off to Las Vegas right after isn’t good enough for you to see that he was behind the attack.
Just wait until they get the investigations and trials going. It’s no longer conspiracy theory if it turns out to be the truth.
Kev
That doesn’t mean shit. That’s like saying FDR was behind Pearl Harbor.
I know it maybe hard to believe that Barack Hussein Obama was behind Benghazi but Presidents are capable of doing something really evil and horrible. Just because he’s President of the United States doesn’t necessarily mean they are innocent and harmless. They can be just as dangerous as Al Qaeda or even worse. Barack Obama is fucking evil. Get over it.
Kev
Wow. This story really hit the media hard today. I bet Obama isn’t happy at all right now. Ha ha!
This is called karma… getting back at him.
I really hope Congress gets the investigations going soon. This is worthy of being investigated.
Kev
You guys are the most ignorant people I’ve ever come across from. You guys will never believe that Obama is a psychotic killer no matter how much hard evidence is out there. I can’t wait until the truth comes out and see the public’s reaction. I’ll sit back with a bag of popcorn.
Kev
In other words, you guys are just as big of a liar just as the US government are. Sorry to say.
Kev
So far there hasn’t been any hard evidence. The only story here is that they covered up what exactly happened. No one, in any of these article, is saying Obama is behind the attacks. No one.
I know there hasn’t… I never said there was any but there WILL be, though. The truth will come out and all the hard evidence will eventually surface at some point. There’s no hard evidence ’cause they are hiding it all. They’re hiding the survivors for the most part.
Kev
You guys don’t realize that the media is helping to protect the Obama administration: NYtimes, CNN, etc.
FOXNews is the only media outlet trying to get the bottom of Benghazi and they are doing a very good job too.
Kev
Fox news is just as bad as the rest of them. They’re all shit.
I know their news is pretty bad. I’m not a big fan of FOXNews myself but when they do their Benghazi stuff is pretty good. If there would be people who would get to the bottom of Benghazi. It should be them. I think their stuff on Benghazi is pretty credible stuff especially their latest story on Susan Rice.
Kev
Forgot to mention, that bitch Susan Rice needs to be locked up too for agreeing to help protecting murderers.
Kev
After Susan Rice being exposed finally, I think even more truth will come out of Benghazi after this.
I don’t give a shit what you guys think. I think Barack Hussein Obama was totally responsible for the attack and sticking with it no matter what anybody says.
You’ll see when more stuff come out.
I think 2014 will be the year when Benghazi will finally have a closure and the mystery would be solved. Benghazi deserves to get answered and once we get those answers, we could hold those accountable. Then we can move on, leave Benghazi behind.
Those 4 deserve their justices.
Kev