I don’t know about you but I really despise the New York Times. NY Times now investigating Marco Rubio’s background and history when the funny thing about that is they refuse to investigate Barack Obama’s background & history.

Why is that do you suppose?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/10/us/politics/marco-rubio-finances-debt-loans-credit.html?_r=0

This is the liberal bias that I’m talking about, y’all. Liberal bias is all over the mainstream media.

There’s nothing bad about Rubio’s past… I mean who cares if he got ticketed for traffic violations and who cares if his financial budgets are not good.

Barack Obama’s past is so shady and mysterious, yet, you don’t see anything about Barack’s questionable past in the media anywhere. Barack Obama associated himself with communist people such as Frank Marshall Davis, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and he associated himself with terrorists and the Pentagon bomber, Bill Ayers. Barack Obama is also a closeted homosexual and crackhead but you don’t see that anywhere in the news. The media refuses to investigate Obama’s fake birth certificate as well, yet they go out of their way to challenge Ted Cruz’s “eligibility”.

Which is more serious Rubio’s traffic violations, financial problems or Barack Obama’s mysterious past with communists/terrorists, him being a closet homosexual and crackhead?

I think the only reason NY Times is trying to bring down Rubio is so he can lose the upcoming election. They’re just trying to find all the bad things about his past the best he can and this is all they can find.

This is all the media does, they try to bring down conservative politicians. That’s how one-sided the media really is and it’s pissing me the hell off, really. The media shouldn’t be “left vs. right” reporting when they need to be realistic on both sides. Honest journalism is dead for sure.

Kev