If you read Perez’s point again, what he’s trying to say is…that he understands that Miss California has a right for an opinion about her views against homosexuals, he just didn’t like the way it was said.
In that videoblog, he made, he was setting an example of a friendlier way of saying it. I guess that’s what he means. If you pay attention to him, he’s actually not trying to force an opinion on her, he actually understands that homosexuality is not for everybody out there, he just thinks that Miss California answered his question in a very offensive way.
Watch his video again. It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it. That’s what Perez is trying to explain to everyone but everyone is calling Perez the badguy.
While I now actually agree with what Perez is trying to say, it is still pretty unprofesional to make a videoblog right after the show, and just post it on his website, bashing her. The readers in his comments thinks Perez is trying to force an opinion on her, which I did too, but after reading Perez’s blog for a while, I now understand what he’s doing. Forcing an opinion on her is not what he’s trying to do. He thinks her saying that, “it’s how she was raised, marriage should be between a man and a woman” is offensive.
I think he has a point but he is still a delusional person, he said the video had boos, but if you pay attention there were loud cheers after Miss California said it.
So who’s the innocent one in this controversy? Neither of them are really. Both of them are acting like freedom of speech doesn’t work both ways, so I’m not defending either of them.
Kev
K'Brocking 
You must be logged in to post a comment.