All posts by Kev Brock

I'm a musician, singer/songwriter, blogger, writer, poet, bodybuilder, movie lover, music lover, video gamer, history/political buff, conservative/republican, etc. I like to do a lot of things.

Film Review: The Hunger Games

Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson, Lenny Kravitz, Donald Sutherland, Liam Hemsworth, Stanley Tucci, Elizabeth Banks
Directed by: Gary Ross

Today, I finally saw the movie, “The Hunger Games”, which is adapted from novel by Suzanne Collins. Here is my review:

Plot/synopsis: In a dystopian future, the totalitarian nation of Panem is divided between 12 districts and the Capitol. Each year two young representatives from each district are selected by lottery to participate in The Hunger Games. Part entertainment, part brutal retribution for a past rebellion, the televised games are broadcast throughout Panem. The 24 participants are forced to eliminate their competitors while the citizens of Panem are required to watch. When 16-year-old Katniss’s young sister, Prim, is selected as District 12’s female representative, Katniss volunteers to take her place. She and her male counterpart Peeta, are pitted against bigger, stronger representatives who have trained for this their whole lives.

This film is getting mixed reviews. You either loved it or hated it. I’ve read the first novel, and I would take the time to defend the film, on why I loved it so much. Yes, it was a great film. You can’t compare this film to the “Twilight” franchise, ’cause this is a different story and style.

Other reviewers and fans are also comparing this film, to “Battle Royale” (which I haven’t yet seen), and Stephen King’s “The Running Man” (starring Arnold Schwarzenegger). I don’t see how you can compare, “The Hunger Games”, to those other films. The way I look at “The Hunger Games”, I see the story being heavily inspired by “Lord of the Flies”, the William Golding novel.

I think, “The Hunger Games”, was pretty faithful to the novel. Everything in the film was pretty dead on, I thought. Jennifer Lawrence was perfect casting for Katniss, and I can’t see anybody else playing that character. I also thought the other casts did a great job. I was most impressed with Donald Sutherland’s (also Kiefer’s father) performance. I also liked Woody Harrelson and Lenny Kravitz in the film. Who knew Kravitz, the rock star could act? I thought Elizabeth Banks’s character, Effie Trinkett, was pretty scary and evil looking, made you want to hate that character.

I thought the movie had some pretty good action, and there was a little blood & gore as well. Lot of explosions too! Anyway, I also thought the movie followed the story from the book pretty well.

My only complaints are the camera were pretty shaky throughout the action scenes, plus, there were some scenes that had some pretty weird camera effects that I found unnecessary. Other than that, I thought the movie was great. It pisses me off that people would want to compare, “The Hunger Games” to Harry Potter, Twilight or any other of the big franchises for kids. Suzanne Collins is no J.K. Rowling or Stephenie Meyer people. Suzanne has her own story.

The whole point about “The Hunger Games”, is not only that it’s a dystopian futuristic story, about a bunch of kids competing in a game, it’s a story about “survival”, period. Suzanne wanted to give kids a story about survival. I thought it was a great movie, and there is nothing wrong with it.

Score for “The Hunger Games” = **** (4 stars as in “excellent”)

Kev

Picked up a drummers instructional book today!!!

Well today, I went out to the mall to check out, “The Hunger Games” movie (review coming a little later), and of course, I did a little shopping. Picked up a few things.

I picked up a drummer’s instructional book from Barnes & Noble, as I said I would. I ended up getting, “The Complete Idiot’s Guide To Playing Drums”. Even if I don’t own a drum set yet, I need to learn the drummers secrets so I can become a better guitar player. I got the “Complete Idiot’s Guide”, ’cause the store didn’t have much books on drum lessons. So I ended up getting this one, just to get me started.

Yep, it’s time to start taking rhythm playing and counting music a little more seriously. I believe a drummers book will help big.

Someday, I will buy a cheap drum set ’cause I’ve always wanted to play drums myself, anyway. I also want to play bass someday too. Play all three instruments, guitar, bass, and drums. I can be a one man band, sometime in the future.

Even if I don’t own a drumset, I can still practice with the virtual drummer on garageband, still pretty much the same thing. Most recording software out there, has a virtual drumset where you can play drums yourself.

Not only that I need to get better at playing with chords with a metronome, I’ll practice keeping my lead guitar solos in time as well.

I also picked up “Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” on Blu Ray, (I think I am going to start collecting Blu Ray more) and I picked up one music CD, Johnny Cash, “Bootleg – Volume IV”.

Kev

RIP: Jim Marshall 1923 – 2012

Jim Marshall, was born in Acton, West London, and he was a businessman, musician, and the pioneer of guitar amplification. He is most famous for creating the Marshall amps, which are mostly used in either half stacks or full stacks. Many famous rock legends have used the Marshall amps over the years and changed rock history forever. Everyone from Jimi Hendrix to Jimmy Page to Pete Townshend to Slash has used them over the years. They are used to create guitar sounds that are able to fill big arenas and large music halls. I know most famous musicians like to use Gibson Les Paul guitars and Marshall amps together. I never played through a Marshall amp before, but I know musician buddies that owned one. This is sad news and another sad loss to the guitar community. RIP Jim, and may the Marshall amps live on forever. I do hope to own a half stack someday, though.

Kev

How venues should really book bands/solo artists to make it easier for us all…

If you think other bands/solo artists, and promoters can be crazy and weird, when it comes to music, the bookers at venues can be much worse. Seriously, I’ve dealt with them over the years! They can be pretty unprofessional, disrespectful and have bad attitudes as well! I’ll leave venue names out, so I won’t get legal threats.

A lot of venues in your area, book shows in different ways. Below I’m going to explain how they do it and why I think it’s wrong. Then, I’ll explain how venues should book bands/artists so they can be more welcoming for us all.

The Way Venues Book Bands and why I think it’s wrong…

  • Venues will sometimes book bands/artists, only if the music is good. They’ll reject the bands/artists that they think are crap. Why I Think It’s Wrong: Simply put, bands/artists don’t like being rejected. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been rejected when I try to book a gig at a certain venue. Trust me, I’ve been rejected a lot over the years, when I tried to send my demo for a possible show booking. All those few gigs I got booked over the years, I got pretty lucky for those venues to actually support my music.
  • Venues will book bands only if you have a large enough following, doesn’t matter if your music is good or not. Why I think it’s wrong: Sometimes it’s hard for a band/artist to pull in more people. I also think it’s disrespectful to unsigned artists getting rejected if the venue think they aren’t able to pull in more people. They should just wait for the night of the show and see what happens. Who knows, more people will come on their own, never know. It is also disrespectful to not let the band/artists perform there again, if they didn’t bring in a large enough crowd at the night of the show.
  • Venues will force you to play an open mic before booking an actual gig. Why I think it’s wrong: I can’t tell you how many fuckin’ times, I tried to book a gig at a venue at a certain place, then they respond back, saying I should play their open mic first before actually booking a show with them. When venues do this, it’ll make me want to avoid that place like the plague. I can understand why the venues want to test the band/artists out to see if he/she can bring in a crowd or see if they are real, those are the reasons, but it’s still disrespectful and rude to a band/artist.

The real way venues should book bands/artists:

  • They should support all local musicians. I know some venues that are supportive of everything, even if the stuff are bad. Believe me, they are out there.
  • Instead of rejecting bands/artists because they don’t have a large enough following or if their music is not good enough, they should book that artist a gig for one night and give them a try out, anyway. Who knows what may happen, and the gig may turn out successful, it’s just a matter of giving them a chance.
  • The person in charge of the booking, should have a professional and good enough attitude. Leaving your egos at the door as well. Seriously guys, bands & artists can have feelings too ’cause us musicians are human beings just like you. I’ve met plenty of rude booking agents over the years.
  • Don’t worry about money, and not worry about how many people, a band/artist brings in. Not all bands & musicians will bring in huge crowds every night. All musicians will play in front of huge crowd to no crowd at all. That’s just the way things are. The venues need to get over their big crowds obsessions. I understand they need to make money and keep the business going, but believe me, they don’t need to be too money hungry. It’s not the end of the world.
  • If a venue feels that a band/artist can’t bring in a crowd, help the band bring in people! I’ve seen this before! I’ve played a few venues where I had trouble getting people in and the venues were on their phones, trying to pull in as many people as possible, so I can have an audience. Why aren’t other venues doing this?
  • When a band artist sends you a link where you can listen to their music and asks to book a gig at the place, reply to all requests. I’ve written to many venues over the years and gotten no response back from a lot of them.

That’s all I can think of as of now. Yeah, the way venues book gigs is bullshit, but it is what it is. This is just local music. I believe people take it too seriously around here.

Kev

Thought: Don’t believe the Ryan Gosling NYC hero story, just yet…

Reports hit the web pretty hard this week that Ryan Gosling, saved a British woman’s life who is a journalist from the UK. She claims she was almost hit by a taxi cab in the streets of NYC and movie star, Ryan Gosling saved her life.

Read, the story here.

I believe this woman is delusional and full of shit. She’s just trying to get attention off of this guy. She’s probably an obsessive fan trying to do whatever it takes to get close to him. She’s just another woman who has the hots for him, nothing more.

How much do you want to bet that Ryan himself is going to squash this and say that her story isn’t true? I’ll bet you $20 bucks on it.

Kev

RIP Kurt and Layne…

The Grunge era back in the 90’s, was a huge part of my life. I believe I was a young kid back then during my high school days. I listened to all the Grunge bands: Nirvana, Alice In Chains, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, etc. That era was part of what made me want to become a guitar player.

I’ll always love the music of Nirvana and AIC. RIP, both Kurt and Layne.

Kev

Local music TV needs to make a return…

I remember years ago during the 90’s, there was a local music TV show called, “Sounding Board” that used to air on WMHT years back. It was a pretty popular TV show that lasted for quite a long time and I remember watching it every week. I remember the show used to be hosted by music writer, J. Eric Smith and Amy Abdou.

Then in early 2006, local music TV briefly made a return. A TV show called, “Groovin On” by Billy Leroux, which I actually performed on once, (the video is in my youtube channel). Billy quit doing that show, which lasted for about a year or so.

I remember, Glens Falls had their own TV show with “8 Trax” by Bob Smith, that featured local bands.

Then there was Ralph’s “Capital Underground” show, but that only lasted for several episodes, I believe.

Today? There’s no local music TV anymore. It needs to make a return!!! A TV show where local bands and acoustic acts can get on to perform. I do miss local music TV though. It’s great publicity for bands & artists around here.

I wish somebody out there would set something up.

I could set up a TV show myself, but I don’t have a place for bands to play or a soundguy to do all that stuff with. So I’ll let somebody else do the work. It would be nice if local music TV made a return though.

Not so I can get on there and perform myself, I want local music TV to return ’cause I support local music and a fan of unsigned music. I just like seeing unsigned acts performing on TV. It’s a pretty cool thing.

Kev

Book Review: “1Q84” by Haruki Murakami

This week, I finally finished reading the book, “1Q84”, on the Ipad for IBooks.

Here’s the plot: The year is 1984 and the city is Tokyo.

A young woman named Aomame follows a taxi driver’s enigmatic suggestion and begins to notice puzzling discrepancies in the world around her. She has entered, she realizes, a parallel existence, which she calls 1Q84 —“Q is for ‘question mark.’ A world that bears a question.” Meanwhile, an aspiring writer named Tengo takes on a suspect ghostwriting project. He becomes so wrapped up with the work and its unusual author that, soon, his previously placid life begins to come unraveled.

As Aomame’s and Tengo’s narratives converge over the course of this single year, we learn of the profound and tangled connections that bind them ever closer: a beautiful, dyslexic teenage girl with a unique vision; a mysterious religious cult that instigated a shoot-out with the metropolitan police; a reclusive, wealthy dowager who runs a shelter for abused women; a hideously ugly private investigator; a mild-mannered yet ruthlessly efficient bodyguard; and a peculiarly insistent television-fee collector.

A love story, a mystery, a fantasy, a novel of self-discovery, a dystopia to rival George Orwell’s—1Q84 is Haruki Murakami’s most ambitious undertaking yet: an instant best seller in his native Japan, and a tremendous feat of imagination from one of our most revered contemporary writers.

I’ve never read, Haruki’s books before. After reading this one, it makes me want to read more of his work if his earlier work are English translated. This guy is a famous writer from Japan, but most of his books are published in the USA in English versions, I believe. The reason I wanted to read this book ’cause the book was creating a lot of buzz on the internet lately, so I got interested in reading it. The story sounded interesting, and when I look at the cover of this book, that’s another reason that would make you want to buy it. The cover of this novel looks pretty cool doesn’t it?

This book took me forever to read but I read the whole thing. It’s almost a thousand pages long, but on the Ipad it’s over: 2,000 pages.

I’ll tell you right now that this story was very addicting. I couldn’t put it down ever since I started it. The book was pretty masterful storytelling. While it is mostly a fantasy story, it has pretty much a little bit of everything in it for everyone. It’s also a romance novel but some of it can get pretty graphic and violent. It can get also get pretty sexual too.

I really loved the story between, Tengo & Aomame. How they kept them apart for most of the book, keeping their story a mystery. The chapters of the book switches back and forth from Tengo to Aomame. The characters seem pretty realistic and they are enjoyable throughout the story. Even the villains in the story can be enjoyable too (yes, there are badguys).

I think “1Q84”, could make a good movie if they did it, right, and it wouldn’t surprise me if Hollywood is planning one soon. While the book is pretty long, it is fast pacing and easy to read. Another reason, that made me want to read it is that I have a big interest in Chinese culture. This is a good book, if you’re looking for something different and unique to read.

Kev

What I’m noticing with WWE…they’re trying to bring back the past, bring back old memories…

What I’m noticing with WWE recently, is that I believe they’re trying to bring back all the guys from the Attitude era from 90’s – early 2000’s. Evidence of that, they brought back the Undertaker. Kane put the mask back on. Chris Jericho came back. Brock Lesnar came back. The Rock as well.

Even with the PG rating these days, I think it’s a good idea to bring these guys back ’cause there’s a new generation of wrestling fans who don’t even know who these guys are. They deserve to get re-introduced to the new fans who never watched WWE in the past.

Who else should they bring back? Well, Dave Batista for starters, I think he is planning a comeback soon. I would like Stone Cold Steve Austin to make another run, but he has no plans for it though. Stone Cold wants to focus on a full time movie career now. I would like it if Kurt Angle returned, but he has no plans either. Angle wants to stick with TNA and he’s trying to make a comeback to the Olympics. I would like the Dudley Boys to return but those guys are in TNA, and the Hardy Boys are gone as well. Jeff Hardy is in TNA, Matt has no wrestling job now, but there are rumors Matt could make a comeback to WWE.

I think what WWE is doing is good. Now that all the old guys from the Attitude Era are coming back, it would make me want to start watching RAW again.

Kev

Bands/musicians should not be so obsessive winning “Battle of the Bands” or other competitions…

After a band or a solo musician wins a huge competition like, “Battle of the Bands” or some other contest, it really bothers me, that after their huge win, they continuously act like it’s the biggest thing that ever happened in their life & career. I mean, really? I don’t mean to disrespect bands and not trying to, just being a little honest and expressing my opinion. I have every right to, as well. I’m also sure, many of you out there would actually agree with me on this one.

After a band wins a huge competition or contest, they’ll go on and on and on about it. Talking about it non stop in interviews and with other people. Congratulations on your win, but that doesn’t mean you’re the biggest band in the world. Sure, winning a battle of the bands or some other competition will definitely help give you a little more exposure, but don’t expect that will help give your band a break through in the music industry. You still have a long ways to go and tons more work to do before thinking about trying to make it in the music business.

When I get my own band going, someday, I’m not going to have anything to do with this stuff. I’m never going to have anything to do with Battle of the Bands or any of the stupid competitions on the radio or whatever. I will also not have anything to do with pay to play schemes.

To me, winning these competitions would mean very “little” to me. I might be a little excited, but I’m not going to be all over it like a person winning the lottery. The only thing that would matter to me the most, is playing the music for the people. That’s more rewarding than anything else. All these silly awards and competitions,  it’s not the Grammy’s or American Idol, folks. They need to get over themselves, no offense. It makes them a bit egotistical, the more they go on about this stuff.

This post isn’t aimed at any band in particular, I’m just expressing my feelings on this stuff. I wish some bands would quit being an opportunist and focus on the music. Bands do what they want to do, sure, but they must do things carefully and responsibly, so they don’t get screwed in their career, sometime down the road.

Kev