
Naomi Watts pictured above…as Marilyn Monroe for the biopic film, “Blonde”. Great work. Makes me want to see the film. Naomi is perfect. I always thought she would make a great Marilyn.
Kev

Naomi Watts pictured above…as Marilyn Monroe for the biopic film, “Blonde”. Great work. Makes me want to see the film. Naomi is perfect. I always thought she would make a great Marilyn.
Kev

Not only that Shia openly admits to hating “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen”, he is also admitting to hate “Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull”. Guess what folks? Shia isn’t alone on hating the new Indy movie. It seems that Harrison Ford even hates it himself. Although Harrison Ford himself haven’t spoken publicly trashing the movie, like he didn’t mind Shia passing the word for it. Now you figured out why George Lucas and Spielberg are planning to do Indy V, because they are trying to make a good Indy movie.
In my opinion, Shia shouldn’t blame himself. It wasn’t him that ruined the movie. I believe it was the writing, too much CGI. Maybe the public didn’t like the idea of mixing Indiana Jones with Science Fiction when it should focus on history. “Crystal Skull” felt too much of a popcorn movie instead of a serious movie like “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “The Last Crusade”. Plus the most popular complaint about the film of them all is when Indy hides in a refrigerator to protect himself from an atomic bomb. I’ll agree that the scene was kind of silly, but I think the rest of the movie was fine. Honestly, I actually liked Indy IV “Crystal Skull”. It wasn’t a bad film, I liked the idea of mixing Indy with sci-fi, it made it a different Indy movie. It was entertaining, that’s all it is. I think Lucas had too much Star Wars mixed into Indy, that could be what it is.
When these guys start to do Indy 5, lets hope they make it right so Indy fans can be happy. They need to make the next Indy film more like, “Raiders/The Last Crusade”. They need to keep away from the popcorn CGI baloney and make it a serious Indy film. I hope they make the next one real good so they won’t get a backlash by the haters again. I have a feeling though, Lucas and Spielberg will probably make Indy V a popcorn film again, wouldn’t surprise me. Lucas and Spielberg are a couple of HUGE egos who don’t care what the fans want to see, yet they only amuse themselves with their film making.
More on it here:
Kev

Other metal legends pays respects to Ronnie James Dio on their official websites, read what they all have to say about RJD here…
Lars Ulrich of Metallica: http://www.metallica.com/index.asp?item=603183
Iron Maiden: http://www.ironmaiden.com/index.php?categoryid=8&p2_articleid=1206
Megadeth: http://www.megadeth.com/home_popup.php?news_id=1462
Judas Priest: http://judaspriest.com/news/default.asp
I’m probably missing more but if I find any, I’ll edit them in.
Kev



Today is yet again, another sad day in the music industry. Just like Peter Steele, Ronnie James Dio’s death started off as a silly rumour which started as a twitter trend. Today RJD’s wife/manager announced the news is true on his official website. Ronnie James Dio is quite the talent, one of the best vocalists in the metal genre. In fact, he was the best. No metal singer could sing better than him. I grew up listening to his music with Black Sabbath, his solo band Dio, and Heaven & Hell. He was a very powerful singer with a unique voice. He is respected for his talent and for his love of performing on stage. RIP Dio. He maybe gone but never forgotten. In honor of his favorite hand signal, I’ll do it too….\m/.
Kev

How do you make a “Superman” movie successful? Simply put, it needs to be right. It needs to stay true to the Superman comics and give what the fans want.
In my belief, here is what fans want to see in the upcoming Superman flick that WB’s and Christopher Nolan is planning:
Enjoy.
Kev
Edit to add: I thought I would add a nice video from the “Superman” cartoon where Superman fights Brainiac. Imagine if there was a live action version of the Brainiac vs. Superman fight scene on the big screen. See how cool Brainiac would be as the next villain.

For the first time, I finally saw the movie, “Bruno” on DVD last night. I’ll have to say that I was quite impressed with the movie, it actually wasn’t that bad. I liked it. It wasn’t actually a comedy I saw. I saw it as more of a serious movie and it was very political. Sacha Baron Cohen plays an Austrian gay fashion reporter who dreams of becoming a famous celebrity. So he does whatever it takes to become famous. Be it, either at a fashion show, trying to get captured by terrorists, adopting a baby, a sex tape with Ron Paul, etc. All those crazy things don’t even work so he keeps trying. There was humor in the film, but I think Sacha Baron Cohen was trying to send a political message with this Bruno character. The film seemed like it was focusing on the world of current events in the news. Terrorism, war, celebrities adopting babies, gay marriage, etc. The material in the movie maybe a bit on the wild side, but without the crazy content the movie would be nothing. Sacha Baron Cohen is NOT gay in real life, this is just a fictional character he created. Sacha Baron Cohen has been involved with Isla Fischer for years now and just married her earlier this year.
I think the message that Sacha is trying to send is that he is trying to mock and humiliate the homosexuality world that has been all over entertainment media and politics as of late. I am not gay and you don’t have to be to watch this movie. There’s a lot of shock factor in this movie, but there is a reason why this movie is so crazy. It’s not a comedy at all, that’s why it is not as funny as “Borat”. It’s a satire, a movie about something real. If you’re scared to watch this movie, don’t be. It was actually kind of inspiring. Sacha is a controversial person and you just never know what he’ll come up with next. Check this movie out, good film.
Kev
I’m not afraid to say that one of the reasons I do this is to hopefully attract more women…especially the cuter and hotter looking women. Isn’t this one of the most popular reasons most men get into fitness for? I believe so. I read that the body part that most women are most attracted to in bodybuilding are the arms. Women like those big arms sticking out of your t-shirt. They also like the six pack which is their second choice. I haven’t had much women give me feedback and comments on my physique yet. A few did, but not a whole lot of ’em.
Some may claim that fitness helps people get hooked up with a significant other faster. In a way, it can be true, but if you don’t get hit on by a woman in public, don’t worry about it. Just keep working on the fitness. The better you look and the bigger you are, who knows, a cute looking woman out there somewhere will become obsessed with you in no time. I hope it happens, but I’m not gonna worry about it. If I don’t attract women at all, no matter how muscular I get, I’m fine with that. I’ll just keep doing what I do.
I hope more women would comment on my physique sometime in the future ’cause I would feel kind of weird if mostly guys are going to keep giving me feedback, lol.
Kev

Well, Sylvester Stallone himself responded to “Rambo V” rumours immediately after the poster was spotted at Cannes. Sly himself tells AICN, that he’s definitely done with Rambo for good. However, he says Miramax can feel free to go on without him if they want to continue the franchise.
More on it here:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/45076
Does this mean that there will be a Rambo “prequel” or a “reboot” on the way? I would prefer a “prequel” of First Blood, instead of a “remake”. A prequel to “Rambo: First Blood”, the first one would be interesting. They could hire a younger actor to play John Rambo. A younger actor that looks similar to Sly. It be interesting if a Rambo prequel actually shows his days during the Vietnam War. “Rambo V” without Sly starring as Rambo and him not directing wouldn’t work. So this leaves open the possibility of a “prequel” or a “remake” is on the way.
If you think Rambo can’t go on without Sly, maybe it can. “Terminator: Salvation” went on without Arnold being in the lead, and that film was successful. So maybe it can work, never know.
Kev

Warner Bros. and Christopher Nolan are about ready to get a new “Supes” flick off the ground. So in order to save the franchise, Warner Bros. files suit against the lawyer who represents the Jerome Siegel heirs, Marc Toberoff. A while back, the Siegel heirs sued Warner Bros. to get full copyrights of the “Superman” character. The Siegel heirs won half of the copyright by owning half of the Superman material while Warner Bros. still owns the other half. The Siegel estate ordered WB’s studios that if they don’t get the new Superman movie made by 2011, they will own full copyright of the Superman franchise. Look like Warner Bros. still wants full copyright of the franchise, so the new Superman movie can be made the right way.
I can’t blame them. I wish WB’s luck and I’m sure they will win this battle. I would like to see a new Superman movie made with WB’s owning full copyrights. I’ll be keeping an eye on this news. I’m a die hard Superman fan more than I am with Batman. Love the Superman franchise so much!
More on it here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/15/business/media/15warner.html?src=busln
Kev


This is one of the most popular arguments and debates in Hollywood right now. “The A-Team” remake vs. “The Expendables”, which film will make the most money in the box office this summer? Some of you may wonder what my thoughts are on this. What do I think will win in the box-office? Honestly, this answer may shock some of you. Knowing that I’m a huge fan of Sylvester Stallone and tough guy action stars…sorry to say…but I’m gonna go with…
The A-Team…
Yes, that’s right. I said it. “The A-Team” will be more successful than “The Expendables”. “The Expendables” will do well in the box office, but they won’t do great. “The Expendables” will never be as big as “Avatar” or the “Dark Knight” if that’s what everyone is hoping. NO fucking way. I think “The Expendables” will do average in the box office just like the last “Rocky” and “Rambo” did average.
Why would the “A-Team” be more successful? Simply because, the original “A-Team” series was such a popular hit on TV back in those days. “The A-Team” movie would be something for the entire family to watch, while the “Expendables” would have an audience mostly of 20-30 something colleged aged males who loves action movies and tough guys. “The A-Team” is a family action film. See my point? “The A-Team” would be a huge box office money maker for many reasons. Not only it would be a family action film, it seems that remakes are hits these days. “The A-Team” would be a movie that a lot of women would see just to see Liam Neeson and Bradley Cooper play in the film.
Why would the “Expendables” fail? Simply because, not many people want to see old washed up muscle has beens all in one movie. The only people that do want to see the film is their fellow bodybuilders who aren’t famous, young college guys, and the few action movie fans that are left around. Plus, I don’t think a lot of people would pay just to see Sly, Arnie and Bruce in a really small scene when everyone wants to see them throughout the entire movie.
I’m betting my money that the A-Team will do very good. I look forward to seeing both films, don’t get me wrong. Don’t expect Stallone to be successful with this one. Honestly, the plot and the acting in the “Expendables” looks kinda silly when the “A-Team” looks more interesting. I’ve always been a huge “A-Team” fan my whole life so of course, I will see this one in theater too. The only reason, “The Expendables” will make some bucks is because of all them stars in one movie. I’m very sure “The Expendables” would bomb terribly if Sly hired a cast full of unknown actors, instead of a movie full of icons.
Kev
You must be logged in to post a comment.